Monday, November 07, 2005

History Just Won't Go Away For democrats

-
Memory Lane, anyone?

[[ The president went on television to announce: "Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years," the vice chairman of the Intelligence committee told the Senate.

The president was Bill Clinton (Dec. 16, 1998). The senator was Jay Rockefeller, a Democrat from West Virginia (Oct. 10, 2002).

These statements should be kept in mind when assessing the hissy fit Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid threw Tuesday when he called the Senate into secret session to discuss whether Bush administration officials had exaggerated prewar intelligence about Iraq.
]]

We all know that there were WMD's... and that the intelligence, although not perfect, was simply adding color to a picture the entire world knew to exist.

[[ "We've had six or seven credible reports of Iraqi weapons being moved into Syria before the war," a senior administration official told reporter Kenneth Timmerman.

Or it could be the Iraq Survey Group had an unusually restrictive definition of what constitutes a WMD stockpile.

The 4th Infantry Division discovered in an ammo dump near the town of Baiji 55 gallon drums of chemicals which, when mixed together, form nerve gas. They were stored next to surface-to-surface missiles which had been configured to carry a liquid payload.

If prewar intelligence was faulty, the fault lies with the CIA which supplied the erroneous information, not with the political leaders, Democratic and Republican, who relied upon it.
But Democrats who had access to the same intelligence President Bush had, and who because of it voted to authorize war with Iraq, are charging now that the president deliberately deceived the nation into war.
]]

Jack Kelly: About That Iraq 'Deception'

Yeah... well, the dems might want to be careful with the whole "I was duped" thing... it will likely blow up in their faces.

-

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Probably inly after a certain alpha kook named Soros finds better things to spend his money on, unfortunately ... :-(

Steve

7/11/05 15:07  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1. Haven't there been 3 different investigations to show that the administration didn't manipulate the intelligence? 2. Didn't all the Senators as well as the White House have the same info? 3. Admitting that you are so easily duped, and don't take responsibility for your actions is not a quality I want in any leader of mine.

10/11/05 17:04  

Post a Comment

<< MAIN PAGE

web counter
web counter