Monday, August 28, 2006

More Of It

-
Yesterday's topic of the Fox journalists brought much commenting... and got me a bit up in arms about the seemingly obvious fact that islam is THE problem in our world. Believe it or not, there are still people trying to question that.

Fortuitously, the great Mark Steyn has weighed in and said with his trademark eloquence what others cannot.

[[ But Centanni and Wiig’s brief interlude as practicing Muslims is revealing in a larger sense. Ever since 9/11, the western multicultural mindset has been desperately trying to swaddle Islam within the fluffy quilt of diversity. It’s “just” another religion, like the Congregationalists and Episcopalians. To be sure, it’s got a few hotheads, but haven’t we all? Sticking with this line requires an awful lot of brushing under the carpet and there’s so much under there by now it looks like a broadloomed Himalayas. For a start, you can’t help noticing the traffic is mostly one-way: In Dr Mahathir’s country, where a long English Common Law tradition is under sustained pressure from sharia, a lady called Lina Joy is currently enduring death threats and a long legal battle because she committed the “crime” of converting from Islam to Catholicism.

Well, that’s Malaysia for you. But how about Michigan? Nazra Quraishi, a kindergarten teacher at a local Muslim school, wrote to The Lansing State Journal last month as follows:

“Islam is a guide for humanity, for all times, until the day of judgment. It is forbidden in Islam to convert to any other religion. The penalty is death.There is no disagreement about it. Islam is being embraced by people of other faiths all the time. They should know they can embrace Islam, but cannot get out. This rule is not made by Muslims; it is the supreme law of God.”

That seems clear enough, doesn’t it? In 1951, Eric Hoffer, America’s great longshoreman philosopher, wrote:

“The manner in which a mass movement starts out can also have an effect on the duration and mode of termination of the active phase of the movement.”

Christians and Muslims are both “people of the book.” But there’s a difference: Christianity started out as a religion of the weak, held by the lowliest in society and advanced by conversion and example, independent of the state. A distinction between religion and temporal power is embedded in its founding narratives. Compare the final words of Jesus to his disciples, on the day of his ascension …

“Ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.”

… with the final words of Mohammed to his disciples:

“I was ordered to fight all men until they say, ‘There is no god but Allah.’”
]]

Yeah... that pretty much sums up what most of us simple folk have been trying to say.

Please read it all... I insist.

Achilles' Heel

-

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, that's... wow. Christianity wasn't/isn't spread by the state? Are we forgetting why the Pilgrims left England in the first place? Not to mention the violence of the Crusades... shall I go on? Religion, in the hands of the powerful, can be a dangerous thing -- regardless of which religion. Is it right to condemn the oppression of women living under sharia, from whom the government strips of the rights to do as they please with their minds and bodies? Absolutely. But first, our own "Christian" government has a few logs it its eyes when it comes to the full humanity of women. This article in particular ridicules the Muslim teaching that once you have submitted yourself to God (which is, by the way, what the word "Muslim" means), you cannot convert away. Is this really so different from teachings in the Judeo-Christian Bible (in intent, "the way, the truth, and the light" sounds rather similar to "no god but God" to me)? Yes, as members of a democracy we object to the state basing its criminal code on that of a religion, rightly so. But again: is this a problem unique to Islam? What if Israel decided to govern by the Law of Moses -- how up-in-arms would you be then?

Obviously, I have little hope that my thoughts will open up your mind. So continue to judge billions of the world's people by a handful of their worst examples. But I do urge you, before condemning another person's Scripture and practices, to examine your own tradition, as well as your own personal prejudices. IIRC, Jesus of Nazareth taught us to be radically patient, pacifist, and kind-spirited. Consider that as you encourage the casting of stones.

28/8/06 11:48  
Blogger kmg said...

Here...

http://rightequalsmight.blogspot.com/2006/08/even-more.html

28/8/06 14:19  
Blogger kmg said...

Here...

Read This

28/8/06 14:21  

Post a Comment

<< MAIN PAGE

web counter
web counter